Research area 04

Technology law & virtual assets

How law classifies digital value, assigns responsibility and turns complex technical records into accountable public decisions.

This programme examines virtual assets, online investment schemes, financial crime, digital evidence and platform accountability. It combines comparative legal research with public-record investigation, carefully distinguishing representation, allegation, regulatory determination, prosecution, judgment, recovery and remedy.

Relevant works
16
Curated resources
09
Investigations
14
Active vocabulary
23

Research map

Three connected lines of inquiry.

The map keeps the programme broad enough to grow while making its boundaries and analytical emphasis visible.

01Perimeter

Classification and regulatory scope

Virtual-asset definitions, property and payment status, securities questions, foreign exchange controls and regulatory boundaries.

02Evidence

Investigation and adjudication

Digital records, attribution, tracing, public disclosures and the distinction between suspicion, allegation, charge and judgment.

03Remedy

Accountability and recovery

Institutional responsibility, consumer protection, asset restraint, forfeiture, restitution and the practical outcome gap.

Current questions

Questions that organise the work.

These are programme-level questions. Individual studies define narrower populations, interventions, systems, jurisdictions and periods.

  1. 01

    How should law distinguish payment instruments, investment products, property, proceeds, evidence and infrastructure when virtual assets serve several roles at once?

  2. 02

    How is responsibility allocated across promoters, platforms, exchanges, banks, regulators and public authorities?

  3. 03

    Which legal and evidential pathways can move a case from allegation to restraint, adjudication, recovery and meaningful remedy?

Research programme

Workstreams, not content buckets.

Each stream can contain projects, publications, evidence reviews, methods, datasets and public outputs without duplicating their underlying records.

01

Comparative law

Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions

Functional comparison of legal definitions, licensing, market conduct, AML/CFT, enforcement and consumer protection.

02

Public-record investigation

Schemes, financial crime and platform rails

Case-based work that reconciles primary records, court reporting, institutional disclosures and technical representations.

03

Policy infrastructure

Law, evidence and durable public records

Annotated legislation, regulatory notices, case timelines, evidence ledgers, visual explanations and public guidance.

Selected work

Research, analysis and public records.

Records are drawn from reviewed programme assignments and retain their existing catalogue, publication and canonical identities.

Browse the catalogue
05

Investigation · Aug 2026

Crypto as Representation, Payment and Proceeds: Five Further Sri Lanka-Connected Case Studies

A comparative public-record investigation distinguishing an unauthenticated Beecoin/Sunbird-branded USDT promotion, Infinity Rover's represented USDT terms, Ledger Block's bounded virtual-asset record, Fruugo Oline's reported e-commerce framing, an alleged downstream Binance rail with no Binance wrongdoing established, and a regional Myawaddy crypto/proceeds typology not attributed to Sri Lankan cohorts.

Related projects

01

completed · Legal researcher

Virtual assets in Sri Lanka and Japan

Comparative legal analysis of how two jurisdictions classify cryptocurrency and virtual assets.

Project record

Research library

Six evidence and communication shelves.

Authorship and evidence type remain explicit. Curated scholarship is never presented as Dr. Arachchige’s publication, and policy or industry material is not presented as peer-reviewed evidence.

01 00

Evidence syntheses

Systematic, scoping and mixed-methods reviews with methods, status, search dates and update policies disclosed.

No public records yet
02 16

Published work

Peer-reviewed outputs, dissertations, reports, investigations and external publications represented by one canonical record.

Current records
03 02

Research by others

Annotated landmark and current studies selected for relevance, quality and their relationship to the active questions.

Reviewed selection
04 05

Policy & industry reports

Regulator, government, standards-body, institutional and industry material, separated from peer-reviewed evidence.

Reviewed selection
05 02

Books & long-form

A selective reading path through foundational and directly relevant books, monographs and chapters.

Reviewed selection
06 00

Visual & public communication

Public explainers, talks, timelines and visual material with a traceable evidence basis.

Developing collection

Shelf 03 · Reviewed selection

Research by others

A bounded selection of landmark or directly relevant scholarly work; it is not represented as a comprehensive bibliography.

Journal article 2020 Peer reviewed Open access

Trading and arbitrage in cryptocurrency markets

Igor Makarov, Antoinette Schoar · Elsevier

Shows how exchange fragmentation, capital controls and cross-border price differences shape crypto-market infrastructure and regulatory questions.

  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.07.001
Journal article 2019 Peer reviewed Open access

Initial Coin Offerings: Financing Growth with Cryptocurrency Token Sales

Sabrina T. Howell, Marina Niessner, David Yermack · Oxford University Press

Provides empirical evidence on token-sale design and outcomes, useful for separating financing mechanisms from their legal and disclosure treatment.

  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
  • DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhz131

Shelf 04 · Reviewed selection

Policy & industry reports

A bounded selection of authoritative policy, legal, standards or institutional material, kept distinct from peer-reviewed scholarship.

Intergovernmental report 2026 Not peer reviewed Open access

Targeted Report on Regulatory Challenges from Decentralised Finance

Financial Action Task Force · Financial Action Task Force

Updates the programme’s regulatory perimeter with a functional analysis of control, supervision and illicit-finance risk in decentralised-finance arrangements.

Jurisdiction
International
Status
Current FATF targeted report
Status reviewed
30 Aug 2026
  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
  • Schemes, financial crime and platform rails
Legislation 2023 Peer review not applicable Open access

Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets

European Parliament and Council of the European Union · Official Journal of the European Union

Provides a major enacted regulatory model for issuance, service-provider authorisation, market conduct and client protection in crypto-asset markets.

Jurisdiction
European Union
Status
EU regulation in force
Status reviewed
30 Aug 2026
Editorial note
The EUR-Lex page provides the current consolidated text and links to the authentic Official Journal act.
  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
  • LEGISLATION‑NUMBER: Regulation (EU) 2023/1114
Regulator guidance 2022 Not peer reviewed Open access

Public Awareness in Relation to the Use of Virtual Currencies in Sri Lanka

Central Bank of Sri Lanka · Central Bank of Sri Lanka

Records the Central Bank’s published position on authorisation, payment-card restrictions and risks, forming a primary Sri Lankan regulatory source.

Jurisdiction
Sri Lanka
Status
Central-bank public notice
Status reviewed
30 Aug 2026
  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
  • Law, evidence and durable public records
Regulator guidance 2021 Not peer reviewed Open access

Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers

Financial Action Task Force · Financial Action Task Force

Defines a functional AML/CFT approach to virtual assets and VASPs and provides a baseline for comparing licensing, supervision and travel-rule implementation.

Jurisdiction
International
Status
Intergovernmental standards guidance
Status reviewed
30 Aug 2026
Editorial note
The issuing page warns that the guidance does not reflect FATF standard revisions made after publication and should be read with newer guidance.
  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
Show 1 more reviewed resources
Legislation 2009 Peer review not applicable Open access

Payment Services Act

Government of Japan · Japanese Law Translation

Supplies the statutory definitions and exchange-service framework central to comparing Japan’s crypto-asset model with Sri Lankan regulatory positions.

Jurisdiction
Japan
Status
Japanese statute; unofficial English translation service
Status reviewed
30 Aug 2026
Editorial note
The English translation is provided for reference; the Japanese text remains authoritative.
  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
  • LEGISLATION‑NUMBER: Act No. 59 of 2009

Shelf 05 · Reviewed selection

Books & long-form

A selective reading path of foundational or directly relevant books and monographs.

Edited book 2019 Peer review not applicable Restricted access

Cryptoassets: Legal, Regulatory, and Monetary Perspectives

Chris Brummer · Oxford University Press

Offers an interdisciplinary legal and policy reading path across token classification, disclosure, monetary questions and Asian regulatory approaches.

  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
  • DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190077310.001.0001
  • ISBN‑13: 9780190077310
  • ISBN‑13: 9780190077358
Book 2018 Peer review not applicable Restricted access

Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code

Primavera De Filippi, Aaron Wright · Harvard University Press

Provides a foundational account of how blockchain architectures interact with legal rules, institutional authority and technology-mediated governance.

  • Legal classification and regulatory perimeter
  • Institutional and platform responsibility
  • Virtual-asset regulation across jurisdictions
  • DOI: 10.4159/9780674985933
  • ISBN‑13: 9780674976429

Shelf 06 · Developing collection

Visual & public communication

No public item is included until its source basis, authorship and programme relevance are verified.

Developing collection

No public resource is currently included on this shelf.

Developing collection; no verified public resource is currently exposed.

Research vocabulary

A visible topic language for people and machines.

Terms describe the actual programme, methods and settings. They support internal navigation and scholarly discovery without repeating hidden or irrelevant keyword lists.

01

Core concepts

  • technology law
  • virtual assets
  • cryptocurrency regulation
  • cryptoasset regulation
  • virtual asset service providers
  • digital assets
  • platform accountability
  • consumer protection
02

Law & enforcement

  • AML/CFT
  • financial crime
  • prohibited schemes
  • pyramid schemes
  • digital evidence
  • asset recovery
  • proceeds of crime
  • foreign exchange law
03

Contexts

  • Sri Lanka virtual asset regulation
  • Japan cryptoasset regulation
  • bank accountability
  • cryptocurrency fraud
  • online investment schemes
  • exchange and wallet evidence
  • regulatory enforcement

Open research infrastructure

Public assets only when the record exists.

Protocols, registrations, datasets, code, evidence ledgers and citation exports appear here only after their public destination and current version have been verified.

No public assets recorded

Availability is not implied.

No programme-level protocol, dataset, code package, evidence ledger or citation export has been verified as publicly accessible under the M4 asset contract.

Discuss this programme

Research, collaboration and public-interest enquiries.

Use the research-area address as the stable entry point; individual outputs and external resources retain their own authorship, publication and citation records.

Contact Dr. Arachchige
Opens in a new tab.